Pesticides: Problem or Placeholder?
- Michelle Donath
- Dec 16, 2024
- 4 min read
We wanted blueberries in winter. What we got was a system that can’t survive without spray.

The Trade-Off We Don’t Talk About
Let’s be honest: we like our food flawless.
Crisp apples with no blemishes. Blueberries in July. Bug-free lettuce packed in plastic and trucked thousands of kilometres without wilting.
You don’t get that kind of food, at that kind of scale, without a chemical assistance.
That assistance? Pesticides.
Fungicides. Herbicides. Insecticides. All designed to protect crops from the things that threaten them, like weeds, fungi, or the bugs that would otherwise make a buffet out of our spinach.
But here’s the question I’m asking:
Have we become too dependent on them? And what are the actual trade-offs behind our desire for cheap, convenient, tidy food?
This isn’t about blaming farmers. It’s about examining the system.
Are Pesticides the Problem?
They're not the original villain. Pesticides were created to solve very real problems, like famine, crop loss, and financial ruin for farmers.
But over time, they’ve gone from tool to crutch.
We Use Them To... | Because... |
Kill weeds | Monoculture farming makes fields vulnerable |
Control fungi & mould | Damp or humid conditions encourage rot |
Keep insects off crops | We breed crops with less natural resistance |
Standardise appearance | Damaged produce doesn’t sell at scale |
Speed up harvest | Desiccants allow synchronized harvesting |
But this kind of widespread use isn’t without consequence.
The Hidden Costs
Impact Area | What Happens When Sprays Become the Norm |
Soil health | Pesticides can reduce microbial diversity + organic matter |
Waterways | Chemical runoff ends up in rivers, lakes, and reefs |
Pollinators | Bees and beneficial insects can be killed or impaired |
Farmer health | Chronic exposure linked to respiratory and neurological issues |
Human biology | Hormonal, neurological, and gut effects are under scrutiny |
Resistance | Overuse creates superweeds and pesticide-resistant insects |
Even when residues are “safe” by regulation, we’re rarely exposed to just one compound at a time.
We’re exposed to many, often daily, and the long-term cocktail effect? We’re only just beginning to understand it.
So… What Else Is Possible?
This is where the conversation gets interesting. Because while “organic” is the default alternative we hear about, there are a growing number of approaches being tested in Australia and globally that go beyond just what’s sprayed.
Biocontrols: Nature Fighting Nature
Biocontrols use one organism to control another, like letting ladybugs eat aphids instead of spraying the plant with insecticide.
Type of Biocontrol | Example in Practice |
Predatory insects | Ladybugs, lacewings, and parasitic wasps used in Australian greenhouse tomato farms and stone fruit orchards |
Microbial enemies | Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacteria used to target caterpillar larvae—widely used in organic-certified veg production |
Fungi or viruses | Trichoderma fungi added to soil to protect plant roots against pathogens |
Used In:
Integrated pest management (IPM) on commercial lettuce and capsicum farms
Controlled-release formulations on Queensland berry farms
Greenhouse and hydroponic systems in Victoria where pest pressure is high but chemical use is limited
Biocontrol isn’t perfect. It requires more observation and sometimes has a learning curve. But it’s gaining traction, especially among farmers who want to protect soil life and avoid spray resistance.
Vertical Farming & Controlled Environments
No weeds. No wind. No pests. No seasons. That’s the promise of vertical farming, growing produce in stacked trays inside buildings, with complete control over light, water, nutrients, and humidity.
Feature | Why It Reduces Pesticide Reliance |
Closed-loop environments | No pest pressure from outside |
LED lighting | Simulates optimal growth without sun-dependence |
Soil-free systems | Less chance of soil-borne pathogens |
Urban location | Reduces need for long-haul transport |
Used In:
Stelaroma Farms in Melbourne: growing pesticide-free leafy greens in refurbished shipping containers
Sprout Stack in Sydney: climate-resilient farming of microgreens and herbs with zero spray use
Plenty (US): scaling up tech to grow strawberries and tomatoes indoors, without chemical inputs
Limitations: High startup cost, energy use, and it's still best suited to light, fast-growing crops like salad greens and herbs.
Regenerative Farming & Biological Inputs
This approach doesn’t just reduce harm, it rebuilds ecosystems.
Regenerative practices rely on the natural intelligence of soil biology, plant diversity, and cycles that work with the land, not against it.
Practice | Why It Helps Replace Pesticides |
Crop rotation | Disrupts pest life cycles naturally |
Cover cropping | Protects soil and deters weeds |
Compost + bio-stimulants | Feeds soil microbes and plant immune systems |
Companion planting | Uses plant diversity to deter pests |
Used In:
Tarwyn Park Training (NSW): teaching landscape rehydration and plant diversity as natural pest buffers
Woodstock Organics (VIC): using compost teas, fermented inputs, and native plant strips as pest barriers
Kiss the Ground-style regen operations globally, including vineyards and mixed farms in SA and TAS
Many of these farms still experience pest pressure, but instead of nuking the problem, they observe, adapt, and shift the system over time.
So… Can We Actually Scale It?
That’s the friction point.
Right now, most of these alternatives require:
More labour
More observation
A different kind of system planning
And most of all… a different kind of support structure
Because our current system subsidises speed, not soil.
Spray-and-go is cheaper, until it’s not.
But the appetite for change is growing. And whether you’re a farmer, a policymaker, or someone just trying to eat better, asking questions is where it starts.
The Bottom Line: Curiosity Over Criticism
I’m not anti-farmer. I’m not anti-tech. And I’m not pretending there’s one perfect answer.
But I am curious. And I think more of us need to be.
How did we get here? What are the costs we’re not counting? And what might grow in place of the sprays if we gave it the right support?
These are the questions I’m sitting with, and inviting you to sit with too.
Because food isn’t just personal. It’s environmental. Systemic. And powerful.
And every rethink starts with us asking the right questions.